What a typical engagement looks like

Hiring someone to build inside your early-stage chaos is a leap of faith. Here’s exactly how I work, so it feels less like one.

Most of my engagements run two to six weeks, scoped to a single sharp question. I work as one person across the whole loop, discovery, design, and build, which means no handoffs, no team to coordinate, and no translation loss between “what we learned” and “what we shipped.” You get speed because there’s no one to hand the baton to.

Here’s the shape of it.
Man balancing on a concrete ledge outside Innovation Hub and Techsphere buildings

FIRST THING’S FIRST

Before we start: a scoping conversation

We start with a short, no-obligation call to figure out whether this is a fit. You tell me the problem, however messy. I’ll tell you honestly whether it’s something I can move fast on, what I’d focus on first, and roughly what it would take. If I’m not the right person for it, I’ll say so and point you somewhere better. You leave the call with a clearer problem either way.

Woman interviewing startup team in focused discussion

Week one: we find the real question

Early-stage problems are fuzzy on purpose, that’s what makes them worth solving. The first job is getting specific: who this is really for, what they’re actually trying to do, and what evidence would tell us we’re right or wrong. I’ll talk to your users or your team, dig into what already exists, and come back with a sharp, testable question instead of a vague mandate. This is where a lot of engagements quietly change direction, because the obvious problem often isn’t the real one.

The middle: I build and test

I design the experience and build a working prototype, real enough to put in front of real users. Not a clickable mockup, not a slide deck, something that actually runs. Then we get it into users’ hands and watch what happens. I share progress as I go, so you’re never waiting weeks in the dark, and you can steer as evidence comes in. This is the part most teams find surprising, because assumptions meet reality here, and reality usually has notes.

Woman building functional prototype on laptop for users

THE END

You leave with signal and something that runs

When we wrap, you have two things. First, a clear read on whether this direction is worth pursuing, grounded in how real users actually responded, not in opinion. Second, a working artifact you own completely: something you can build on, demo to investors, hand to your engineers, or take straight into your roadmap. There’s no dependency on me to make sense of it, and no open-ended retainer you have to keep feeding. The goal is to leave you with momentum, not a monthly invoice.

What I need from you

The engagements that go best share three things: a real problem you genuinely care about solving, access to the people it’s for (your users, or a fast path to them), and a willingness to let evidence change the plan. If you have those, we’ll do good work together.

And if you need more than a sprint

Some founders don’t need a one-off project, they need a builder-operator alongside them through an extended ambiguous stretch. If that’s you, we can talk about an ongoing fractional arrangement instead. But most people start with a single scoped engagement, and I’d usually recommend that, it’s the lowest-risk way to find out what it’s like to work together.

Handshake agreement between woman and colleague